Clinical signs and symptoms of Wilson disease in a real-world cohort of patients in the United States: a medical chart review study

IntroductionThere are limited data from the United States regarding the real-world signs and symptoms of Wilson disease (WD). This retrospective, observational medical chart review was conducted to identify real-world characteristics of patients with WD in the United States, as well as WD signs and symptoms at diagnosis and over time.MethodsDe-identified clinical data were abstracted from medical charts of US patients diagnosed with WD between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2017. Hepatic, neurologic, and psychiatric biochemical findings, signs, and symptoms were characterized at diagnosis and follow-up/during treatment.ResultsIn total, 225 WD patients were included in the study. The mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 24.7 (9.8) years, and 65.3% were male. Median (Q1–Q3) follow-up after diagnosis was 39.5 (33.8–60.4) months. The most common disease presentation at WD diagnosis was combined neurologic/psychiatric and hepatic (52.9%), followed by neurologic/psychiatric (20.0%), hepatic (16.9%), and asymptomatic (10.2%). Common clinical characteristics at diagnosis were Kayser-Fleischer rings (77.2%), low ceruloplasmin levels (95.2%), high hepatic copper (97.8%), elevated 24-hour urinary copper excretion (90.2%), and abnormal liver function tests (38.7%–85.1%). At diagnosis, the most common biochemical findings or hepatic sign/symptoms were abnormal liver enzymes (50.7%), abdominal pain (16.6%), and fatigue (15.7%). The most common neurologic signs/symptoms were headache (18.3%), dysarthria (17.4%), and ataxia (17.0%). Common psychiatric signs/symptoms included anxiety/depression/other mood changes (36.2%), emotional lability (12.8%), and increased irritability/anger outbursts (9.2%). Prevalence of biochemical abnormalities or signs/symptoms among patients at diagnosis and after ~1-year follow-up were neurologic (60.1% and 44.0%), hepatic (69.6% and 37.8%), and psychiatric (53.7% and 37.6%), respectively. Common new onset symptoms at ~1-year post-WD diagnosis were abnormal liver enzymes (5.6%), headache (6.2%), and anxiety/depression/other mood changes (7.2%).ConclusionsThese real-world, descriptive data highlight the clinical complexity and heterogeneity of WD and the need for better education about diagnostic testing and multidisciplinary support. Although rare, the neurologic, psychiatric, and hepatic signs/symptoms of WD have a substantial clinical impact

Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) exception guidelines: Results and recommendations from the MELD exception study group and conference (MESSAGE) for the approval of patients who need liver transplantation with diseases not considered by the standard MELD formula

No abstract.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/55914/1/20979_ftp.pd

Open‐label, clinical trial extension:Two‐year safety and efficacy results of seladelpar in patients with primary biliary cholangitis

SummaryBackgroundSeladelpar is a potent and selective peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor‐δ agonist that targets multiple cell types involved in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), leading to anti‐cholestatic, anti‐inflammatory and anti‐pruritic effects.AimsTo evaluate the long‐term safety and efficacy of seladelpar in patients with PBC.MethodsIn an open‐label, international, long‐term extension study, patients with PBC completing seladelpar lead‐in studies continued treatment. Seladelpar was taken orally once daily at doses of 5 or 10 mg with dose adjustment permitted for safety or tolerability. The primary analysis was for safety and the secondary efficacy analysis examined biochemical markers of cholestasis and liver injury. The study was terminated early due to the unexpected histological findings in a concurrent study for non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis, which were subsequently found to predate treatment. Safety and efficacy data were analysed through 2 years.ResultsThere were no serious treatment‐related adverse events observed among 106 patients treated with seladelpar for up to 2 years. There were four discontinuations for safety, one possibly related to seladelpar. Among 53 patients who completed 2 years of seladelpar, response rates increased from years 1 to 2 for the composite endpoint (alkaline phosphatase [ALP] &lt;1.67 × ULN, ≥15% decrease in ALP, and total bilirubin ≤ULN) and ALP normalisation from 66% to 79% and from 26% to 42%, respectively. In those with elevated bilirubin at baseline, 43% achieved normalisation at year 2.ConclusionsSeladelpar was safe, and markedly improved biochemical markers of cholestasis and liver injury in patients with PBC. These effects were maintained or improved throughout the second year. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03301506; Clinicaltrialsregister.eu: 2017‐003910‐16.</jats:sec

Nomenclature, Diagnosis and Management of Drug-induced Autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-ALH): An expert opinion meeting report.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) can mimic almost all other liver disorders. A phenotype increasingly ascribed to drugs is autoimmune-like hepatitis (ALH). This article summarizes the major topics discussed at a joint International Conference held between Drug-Induced Liver Injury consortium and the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. DI-ALH is a liver injury with laboratory and/or histological features that may be indistinguishable from those of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Previous studies have revealed that patients with DI-ALH and those with idiopathic AIH have very similar clinical, biochemical, immunological and histological features. Differentiating DI-ALH from AIH is important as patients with DI-ALH rarely require long-term immunosuppression and often resolve spontaneously after stopping the culprit drug whereas patients with AIH mostly need long-term immunosuppression. Therefore, revision of the diagnosis on long-term follow up may be necessary in some cases. More than 40 different drugs including nitrofurantoin, methyldopa, hydralazine, minocycline, infliximab, herbal and dietary supplements such as Khat and Tinospora cordifolia have been implicated in DI-ALH. Understanding of DI-ALH is limited by the lack of specific markers of the disease that could allow a precise diagnosis and similarly, there is no single feature which is diagnostic of AIH. A management algorithm is proposed. There is an urgent need to prospectively evaluate patients with DI-ALH systematically to enable definitive characterization of this condition

Nomenclature, diagnosis and management of drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-ALH): An expert opinion meeting report

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) can mimic almost all other liver disorders. A phenotype increasingly ascribed to drugs is autoimmune-like hepatitis (ALH). This article summarises the major topics discussed at a joint International Conference held between the Drug-Induced Liver Injury consortium and the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. DI-ALH is a liver injury with laboratory and/or histological features that may be indistinguishable from those of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Previous studies have revealed that patients with DI-ALH and those with idiopathic AIH have very similar clinical, biochemical, immunological and histological features. Differentiating DI-ALH from AIH is important as patients with DI-ALH rarely require long-term immunosuppression and the condition often resolves spontaneously after withdrawal of the implicated drug, whereas patients with AIH mostly require long-term immunosuppression. Therefore, revision of the diagnosis on long-term follow-up may be necessary in some cases. More than 40 different drugs including nitrofurantoin, methyldopa, hydralazine, minocycline, infliximab, herbal and dietary supplements (such as Khat and Tinospora cordifolia) have been implicated in DI-ALH. Understanding of DI-ALH is limited by the lack of specific markers of the disease that could allow for a precise diagnosis, while there is similarly no single feature which is diagnostic of AIH. We propose a management algorithm for patients with liver injury and an autoimmune phenotype. There is an urgent need to prospectively evaluate patients with DI-ALH systematically to enable definitive characterisation of this condition